Legal Opinion

Aransas Project v. Bryan Shaw

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 30, 2014No. 13-40317PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

After the deaths of some whooping cranes — an endangered species — The Ar-ansas Project (“TAP”) sued directors of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (“TCEQ”) under the Endangered Species Act (“ESA” or the “Act”). TAP sought and was granted an injunction prohibiting TCEQ from issuing new permits to withdraw water from rivers that feed the estuary where the cranes make their winter home. The injunction also required TCEQ to seek an incidental — take permit (“ITP”) from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (“FWS”). A motions panel of this court stayed the injunction pending appeal. We…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Willie Meche v. Key Energy Services, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
  2. Appliance v. Axis SupplyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024
  3. Aransas Project v. Bryan ShawCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
  4. California River Watch v. County of SonomaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
  5. Aransas Project v. Bryan ShawCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API