Legal Opinion

Hill v. Doerfler

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1935PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

■ROSSMAN, J.

In 1926, Frank A. Doerfler and Daniel J. Fry, Jr., who, together with their wives, are the defendants in this suit, purchased from one C. J. Ramsden a tract of land in Marion county containing a little less than 100 acres at a price of $9,000. The full purchase price was not paid at that time and all of it had not been paid in August, 1930, when Doerfler and Fry, as we shall later see, sold 20 acres of the tract to the plaintiffs in this suit. Immediately after contracting to make the purchase Doerfler and Fry planted a substantial portion of the tract in filbert trees.

August 15,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Frink v. ThomasOregon Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Sharkey v. Burlingame Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Sheehan v. McKinstryOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Strong v. MooreOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Kares v. CovellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Arko Enterprises, Inc. v. WoodDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  2. State Highway Commission v. RollinsWyoming Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Davis v. Dean Vincent, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Rands v. EwingOregon Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API