Legal Opinion

Helvering v. William Flaccus Oak Leather Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 28, 1941No. 627PublishedCited by 120 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Murphy

In September, 1935, respondent’s plant was destroyed* by fire. Later that year it received $73,132.50 from an insurance company as compensation for the loss of buildings, machinery, and equipment. The buildings, machinery; and equipment had been fully depreciated for income tax purposes prior to 1935, and no part of the insurance proceeds was used to acquire other property similar or related in service or use to the property de-. stroyed, or to acquire control of a corporation owning such property, or to establish a fund to replace the property destroyed.

In its return for 1935, respondent…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Burnet v. HarmelSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Helvering v. HammelSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Burnet v. Chicago Portrait Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Fairbanks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. McClain v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by120 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Commissioner v. Gillette Motor Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Stolk v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1963
  4. Commissioner v. KorellSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Central Tablet Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API