Helvering v. Hammel
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone
We are asked to say whether a loss sustained by an individual taxpayer upon the foreclosure sale of his interest in real estate, acquired for profit, is a loss which, under §' 23 (e) (2) of the 1934 Revenue Act, 48 Stat. 680, may be deducted in full from gross income for the purpose of arriving at taxable income, or is a capital loss deductible only to the limited extent provided in §§ 23 (e) (2), (j>, and 117.
In the computation of taxable income § 23 (e) (2) of the 1934 Revenue Act permits the individual taxpayer to deduct losses sustained during the year incurred in any transaction for…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Burnet v. HarmelSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- United States v. PhellisSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Haggar Co. v. Helvering, Com'r of Internal RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- White v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. KatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by280 opinions
- Rowland v. California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Commissioner v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. RutherfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
275 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.