Legal Opinion

Ripchick v. Pearsons

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided November 3, 1954No. 1254PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSherburne, C. J.

This is an action in tort for trespass for wrongful cutting of timber and seeking treble damages under V. S. 47, §8403, resulting in a directed verdict for the defendant Pearsons and a general verdict against the other two defendants for actual damages and a special verdict answering in the negative a question asking if these two defendants had satisfied the jurors by a fair balance of the evidence that, in cutting such trees as they find were cut on the plaintiff’s land, the defendants acted through mistake or had good reason to believe the trees so cut were trees owned by the International…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Parrow v. ProulxSupreme Court of Vermont · 1940
  2. Spiller v. ScribnerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1863
  3. Clement v. Bank of RutlandSupreme Court of Vermont · 1889
  4. Beach v. StearnsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1825

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pion v. BeanSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
  2. Amey v. HallSupreme Court of Vermont · 1962
  3. Spooner v. MenardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1963
  4. Krupp v. State Highway BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1965
  5. Ranney Dairy Farm, LLC Major Subdivision Appeal - Merits DecisionVermont Superior Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API