Legal Opinion

Parrow v. Proulx

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 1, 1940PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSherburne, J.

This is an action of .tort based upon P. L. 8555 for the wilful and malicious removal of an alleged boundary fence and markers. Verdict and judgment were for the plaintiffs, and the case comes here upon defendant’s exceptions.

The plaintiffs and defendant’s wife are adjoining owners of lots on the westerly side of the Malletts Bay road in Colchester, and derive their respective titles from a common source, Josephine Pagel and Marie Levesque, who held title to same in one parcel of about four acres. The southerly line of this parcel, which was also the northerly line of the land of Fred…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ingelson v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  2. Ainsa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Oakes v. . DelanceyNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Johnson v. Pannel's HeirsSupreme Court of the United States · 1817
  5. D'Orazio Et Ux. v. PashbySupreme Court of Vermont · 1930

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Henderson and SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
  2. Davidson v. VaughnSupreme Court of Vermont · 1945
  3. Ogilvie v. MangelsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  4. Enequist v. BemisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1947
  5. Proulx v. ParrowSupreme Court of Vermont · 1948

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API