Legal Opinion

Pion v. Bean

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided August 29, 2003No. 02-179PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSkoglund, J.

¶ 1. Plaintiffs Leita and Roland Pion appeal from the trial

court’s order in this boundary dispute and tort action. Plaintiffs contend that the trial court erred in: (1) establishing the northern boundary of defendants’ lot; (2) finding for defendants on their claims of invasion of privacy, infringement of riparian rights, and conversion; and (3) awarding compensatory and punitive damages to defendants. We affirm.

¶ 2. Plaintiffs and defendants own adjoining residential lots in St. Albans, Vermont. Plaintiffs’ lot, less than one acre in size, resembles an upside-down “u.” It surrounds…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Bull v. Pinkham Engineering Assocs., Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  2. Cabot v. CabotSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  3. Woodhouse v. Woodhouse Et Ux.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1925
  4. Kanaan v. KanaanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  5. Soucy v. Soucy Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1983

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Wesco, Inc. v. SorrellSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
  2. Fly Fish Vermont, Inc. v. Chapin Hill Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2010
  3. Kneebinding, Inc., John Springer-Miller, Tina Springer-Miller and ACL Investments, LLC v. Richard HowellSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
  4. Shlansky v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
  5. Shahi v. MaddenSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API