Legal Opinion

Hot Wax, Inc. v. Warsaw Chemical Co., Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 16, 1999No. 97 C 6885PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

COAR, District Judge.

Before this court are Defendant Warsaw Chemical Company, Inc.’s (“Defendant” or “Warsaw”) cross-motion for summary judgment and Plaintiff Hot Wax, Inc.’s (“Plaintiff’ or “Hot Wax”) cross-motion for partial summary judgment as to liability on Plaintiffs complaint, which alleges that Defendant engaged in false advertising in violation of § 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a). Also before this court are Plaintiffs motions to strike portions of the Affidavit of Kenneth E. Bucher (“Bucher”) and testimony of Jeffrey Rufner (“Rufner”). For…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Donald C. Hedberg v. Indiana Bell Telephone Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Island Insteel Systems, Inc. v. WatersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  2. Fischer v. Viacom International, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2000
  3. Sanderson v. Spectrum Labs, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2000
  4. Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Exide Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001
  5. Chattanoga Manufacturing, Inc. v. Nike, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API