Legal Opinion

Russell v. Municipality of Anchorage

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1987No. S-1782PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice.

The issue presented on appeal is whether the superior court properly dismissed Debra Russell’s federal and state law discrimination claims against the Municipality of Anchorage (Municipality) as barred by Alaska’s two-year tort statute of limitations. Specifically in question is whether the statute of limitations began to run in 1983, when the Municipality denied Russell admission to the police academy, or in 1985, when she first became aware of circumstances allegedly indicating that the Municipality’s acts constituted illegal discrimination.

I. Facts and…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY v. TomanioSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Nial Ruth Cox v. A. M. Stanton, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
  5. Keating v. CareyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. John's Heating Service v. LambAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Pedersen v. ZielskiAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Gefre v. Davis Wright Tremaine, LLPAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Mine Safety Appliances Co. v. StilesAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Cameron v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1991

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API