Legal Opinion
Rodenbeck v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided June 6, 1997No. 1:96-cv-00378PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
COSBEY, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the Court 1 on the motion of the Defendant Norfolk and Western Railway Company (“NW”), filed April 24, 1997. NW seeks a protective order and a motion in limine concerning evidence, testimony and opinions relating to certain correspondence (the “Etzler-DeLaCroix correspondence”) produced to the Plaintiff by a third-party during discovery regarding a certain railroad grade crossing in Allen County, Indiana, the subject of this lawsuit. (See Def. Exhs. A-E.)
On May 8, 1997 the Plaintiff,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- CSX Transportation, Inc. v. EasterwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Odis Robertson v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Harrison v. Burlington Northern Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Shots v. CSX Transportation, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1995
3Cited by11 opinions
- Guillen v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Guillen v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Carson v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
- Fry v. Southern Pacific Transp. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
- Powers v. CSX Transportation, Inc.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.