Legal Opinion
Guillen v. Pierce County
Washington Supreme Court
Decided September 13, 2001No. 68535-5PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
31 P.3d 628 (2001)
144 Wash.2d 696
Ignacio GUILLEN, as legal guardian for Jennifer Guillen and Alma Guillen, minors; and Mariano Guillen, as legal guardian for Paulina Guillen and Fatima Guillen, Respondents,
v.
PIERCE COUNTY, a municipal corporation, Petitioner.
The Estate of Clementina Guillen-Alejandre, Defendant,
Robert and LuAnn Whitmer, husband and wife, individually, and as the guardians of Shanna Whitmer, a minor, Hannah Whitmer, a minor, and Denel Whitmer, an incapacitated person, Respondents,
v.
Chin S. Yuk and "Jane Doe" Yuk, husband and wife, and the marital community composed thereof,…
2Cases cited83 opinions
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. PerezOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- Pierce County v. GuillenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Soter v. Cowles Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- Soter v. Cowles Pub. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. RiceWashington Supreme Court · 2012
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.