Guillen v. Pierce County
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBridge, J.
— The respondents in these consolidated cases seek access to accident reports and other materials and data held by the local government petitioners relating to the traffic history of the sites of their subject car accidents. Petitioners claim that all accident reports are nondiscoverable, since RCW 46.52.080 declares them “confidential” and inadmissible. Petitioners also contend that all the materials and data at issue are privileged under 23 U.S.C. § 409 — and consequently also exempt from public disclosure under RCW 42.17.310(1)(j) — since they were, according to sworn declarations in the…
2Cases cited81 opinions
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. PerezOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- Pierce County v. GuillenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Soter v. Cowles Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- Soter v. Cowles Pub. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. RiceWashington Supreme Court · 2012
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.