Legal Opinion

Smith v. Combustion Resources Engineering, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 20, 1983No. 81-1062PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We are asked to review several issues here. They are: whether the failure to plead an affirmative defense precludes the party from raising it at the trial; whether it is necessary for a party to produce evidence of the amount of attorney's fees incurred in collecting a promissory note when the note contains a provision specifying the amount of attorney's fees to be paid in the event of a default; and whether a Rule 60 (a), ARCP, motion is the appropriate means for correcting a mistake in the name of a party after the trial court has rendered its judgment. We affirm conditionally, because the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Funding Systems Leasing Corporation v. Garland B. Pugh, Sr., Individually and D/B/A Georgia Tractor and Equipment CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  2. Stephenson v. AllisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  3. Continental Oil Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  4. Vinyard v. Republic Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  5. Ledbetter & Co. v. VintonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bechtel v. Crown Cent. Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  2. Chapman Nursing Home, Inc. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  3. Government Street Lumber Co. v. AmSouth Bank, NASupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. Honeywell, Inc. v. Ruby Tuesday, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
  5. Grieser v. Advanced Disposal Servs. Ala., LLCCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2017

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API