Legal Opinion

Chapman Nursing Home, Inc. v. McDonald

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 16, 2007No. 1060543PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

Chapman Nursing Home ("CNH") appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of Cathy Ann Boddie McDonald. The trial court found that CNH's claims of fraud and civil theft were barred by the affirmative defenses of res judicata and collateral estoppel. We affirm on the basis that CNH's claims are barred by the doctrine of res judicata.

Facts and Procedural History

In March 2003, CNH terminated the employment of Cathy Ann Boddie McDonald and James Chapman. McDonald…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. William Edwards v. Aetna Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  4. Ex Parte GrahamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  5. Dairyland Ins. Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Aliant Bank v. Four Star Invs., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2017
  2. Ex parte ChesnutSupreme Court of Alabama · 2016
  3. Greene v. Jefferson County CommissionSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  4. Baldwin Mut. Ins. Co. v. McCainSupreme Court of Alabama · 2018
  5. Bradberry v. Carrier Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API