Legal Opinion
Honeywell, Inc. v. Ruby Tuesday, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided April 5, 1999No. Civ. 97-2098 (DSD/JMM)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DOTY, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for partial summary judgment. Based on a review of the file, record, and proceedings herein, the court (1) grants defendant’s motion regarding the invalidity of the one-year limitations clause, (2) continues the parties’ cross-motions regarding the validity of the attorney’s fee clause, (3) grants in part and denies in part plaintiffs motion regarding the validity of the exoneration clause, and (4) denies the parties’ cross-motions as they pertain to other issues.
BACKGROUND
This case arises out of a dispute…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Allstate Insurance v. HagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Henning Nelson Construction Co. v. Fireman's Fund American Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Core-Mark Midcontinent, Inc. v. Sonitrol Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- Florida State Board of Administration v. Law Engineering & Environmental Services, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2003
- Gage v. HSM ELECTRONIC PROTECTION SERVICES, INC.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- ADT Security Services, Inc. v. SwensonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2011
- Florida State Bd. of Ad. v. Engin., Environ. Serv., Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.