Legal Opinion

Claremont Country Club v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1917No. S. F. No. 7759PublishedCited by 41 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Certiorari to review an award of the Industrial Accident Commission of the State of California. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

Review to annul an award of the Industrial Accident Commission. On March 7, 1915, Raymond Harris, a boy fourteen years of age, while caddying for a member of the Claremont Country Club, leaned against the hand-rail of a bridge spanning a small creek on the golf course of the club. The rail gave way and the boy fell backward into the creek, suffering a permanent injury to one of his elbows. He filed his claim for compensation with the In dustrial Accident Commission. The Claremont Country Club and its insurer, the Aetna Life Insurance Company, answered, denying only the fact of employment. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brown v. KellySupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  2. Boswell v. LairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
  3. Fay v. German Gen. Benevolent Soc'yCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Claim of Kilberg v. VitchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  5. Gaines v. BardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1893

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Press Publishing Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Laeng v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. In-Home Supportive Services v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. Packard v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1975
  5. California Employment Commission v. Los Angeles Down Town Shopping News Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API