Legal Opinion
Flood v. Phillips
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 30, 2004No. 01-2249PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLAY, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner Claude Flood was convicted by a jury in Michigan state court on various charges of criminal sexual conduct and extortion in violation of Michigan Compiled Laws §§ 750.520d(1)(b). 750.520e(1)(a) and 750.213. Petitioner appeals from the district court’s judgment denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, pursuant to the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (“AEDPA”). 28 U.S.C. § 2254. For the reasons set forth below, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.
BACKGROUND
Petitioner’s habeas petition, as well as his appeal, relates to his Michigan…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Frank Howard v. Barbara Bouchard, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Darryl Gumm v. Betty MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- James Drain v. Jeffrey WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Drain v. WoodsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2012
- Darryl Gumm v. Betty MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.