Legal Opinion
Frank Howard v. Barbara Bouchard, Warden
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 28, 2005No. 03-1850PublishedCited by 277 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GWIN, D. J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which GILMAN, J., joined. MOORE, J. (pp. 486-88), delivered a separate dissenting opinion.
OPINION
GWIN, District Judge.
With this case we decide whether Petitioner-Appellant Frank Howard (“Howard”) was denied his constitutional right to due process when a Michigan court permitted three eyewitnesses to identify Howard as the killer of Theodore Hankinson. Howard complains that the three eyewitnesses saw Howard at two scheduled, then cancelled, preliminary hearings before they identified him in a lineup. Howard argues that seeing him at the…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by277 opinions
- Joel Dufresne v. Carmen PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Hoffner v. BradshawCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Jells v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Clayton Thomas v. Ben Varner the District Attorney of the County of Philadelphia the Attorney General of the State of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Derry Lovins v. Tony ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
272 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.