Legal Opinion

Southern Surety Co. v. Waits

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 2, 1915No. 3991PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Error from County Court, McIntosh County; Franlc W. Bushing, Judge. Action by J. M. Waits against the Southern Surety Company, a corporation. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHardy, J.

On January 16, 1911, C. E. Nichols entered into a contract with the city of Checotah for the construction of a sewer system in said city, and on March 27, 1911, entered into a contract with said city for the installation of an extension of its waterworks plant, and executed • and delivered to said city- two bonds, with the Southern Surety Company as surety, both of which bonds were conditioned that the said Nichols should 0pay all bills incurred for labor and material furnished in the installation -and completion of said work. During the .progress of said work said Nichols issued certain…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. City of St. Louis ex rel. Glencoe Lime & Cement Co. v. Von PhulSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  2. Lyman v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Baker & Co. v. BryanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
  4. Kaufmann v. CooperNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Philadelphia v. StewartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. In Re Assessment of Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  3. Board of Com'rs of Garfield Co. v. FieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Southwestern Surety Ins. Co v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. City of Pocatello v. FargoIdaho Supreme Court · 1925

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API