Legal Opinion

Sprint Telephony PCS, L.P. v. Board of Equalization

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 16, 2015No. A140540PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HUMES, P. J.

Appellants Sprint Telephony PCS, L.P., Sprint Spectrum L.P., Wirelessco, L.P., Nextel of California, Inc., and Nextel Boost of California, LLC (collectively referred to as Sprint or the company), filed this action seeking a refund on taxes they paid on property assessed by respondent Board of Equalization (the Board). The Legislature has mandated that for a telephone company to file such a judicial tax-refund action it must first file a petition for reassessment with the Board stating “in the petition [that] it is intended to . . . serve [as a claim for refund].” (Rev. &…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kaufman & Broad Communities, Inc. v. Performance Plastering, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  2. Hunt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Woosley v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Steinhart v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Alan v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Schoendorf v. U.D. Registry, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. McClain v. Sav-On DrugsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. In re Franchise Tax Bd. Ltd. Liab. Corp. Tax Refund Cases, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. County of Santa Clara v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2023
  5. Franchise Tax Bd. Limited Liability Corp. Tax Refund CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API