Legal Opinion

Gurunian v. Grossman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1951No. Docket 64, Calendar 45,133PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyles, J.

Tbe principal question in this case is whether the defendants are lessees of a place of business on Trumbull avenue in Detroit for a 5-year term. The facts are not in dispute. On July 6, 1944, the plaintiff herein leased said premises to Ben Weitzman and Jack Klein for a 5-year term ending July 5, 1949. The written lease provided:

“In case any rent shall be due and unpaid or default, be made in any of the covenants herein contained, then it shall be lawful for the landlord, his certain attorney, heirs, representatives and assigns, to re-enter into, repossess the said premises and the tenant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hogsett v. EllisMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Howell v. BehlerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. LeBaron Homes, Inc. v. Pontiac Housing Fund, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Smith v. Detroit Loan & Building Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  5. MacGlashan v. HarperMichigan Supreme Court · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Langer v. BartholomayNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Feister v. BosackMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Fries v. FriesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Newburgh/Six Mile Limited Partnership v. Adlajbs Films USA, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010
  5. Bernier v. BensonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1959

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API