Legal Opinion
Mosesian v. County of Fresno
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 1, 1972No. Civ. 1569PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BROWN (G. A.), J.
Plaintiffs and respondents, Paul S. Mosesian, Charles S. Mosesian, Suren P. Mosesian and Marion G. Mosesian, hereinafter referred to as “Mosesians,” recovered judgment for $22,575 damages in this action in inverse condemnation against the defendant and appellant County of Fresno.
The county raised a number of affirmative defenses in the trial court, including implied dedication, various statutes of limitation, equitable estoppel and failure to comply with the claim law. The only issue urged by the county for reversal on this appeal is the failure of Mosesians to comply…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Estate of TeedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Farrell v. County of PlacerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Dillon v. Board of Pension CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Estate of LingenfelterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- City of San Jose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Loehr v. Ventura County Community College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Stearns v. Select Comfort Retail Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2010
- Clarke v. UptonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
- Mehl v. People Ex Rel. Department of Public WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.