Legal Opinion

Estate of Lingenfelter

California Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1952No. Sac. 6131PublishedCited by 100 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*575EDMONDS, J.

Madge Tucker, sister of Homer Lingenfelter, proposed for probate the purported will of Vivian Lingenfelter, his deceased widow. The contest of Lenore DeArmond is based upon the asserted incompetency of the testatrix. It is also charged that the will was executed as the result of duress and undue influence exercised by the proponent and her husband. The appeal is from a judgment entered upon a verdict in favor of the contestant and from an order denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.

Homer Lingenfelter was an attorney practicing in partnership with Arthur Powell.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Peterson v. LoganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Estate of PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Estate of SextonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Finkler v. PurcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Llewellyn v. CheesewrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by100 opinions

  1. Estate of TeedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. Jamison v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Estate of FritschiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Fairchild v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Hubbard v. DaBellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API