Legal Opinion

Page v. Page

California Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1888No. 12640PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Alameda County vacating an order setting aside a previous order for alimony. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Hayne, C

In a suit for divorce the trial court made an order that the plaintiff pay to the defendant a certain sum as alimony and counsel fees, pendente lite. About three weeks afterward the court made a second order setting aside the first. Thereupon the plaintiff took certain steps, which, it is claimed, constituted a dismissal of the suit. A few weeks after this the court made a third order, wherein it is recited that the second order, setting aside the order for alimony and counsel fees, was “obtained by' means of an artifice and trick practiced upon this court.” The plaintiff attempted to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Page v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Brady v. Times-Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Consolidated Construction Co. v. Pacific Electric RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Rochat v. GeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Bryant v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. Clopton v. CloptonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1902

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API