Legal Opinion

Lee v. Hillman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1913No. 11071PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Gilliam, J., entered November 7, 1918, dismissing an action for usurious interest paid, upon sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

— The plaintiff seeks recovery from the defendants of the value of certain property which he claims to have surrendered to them in payment of usurious interest upon loans made by them to him. The defendants demurred to the plaintiff’s complaint upon the sole ground that it failed to state a cause of action. The demurrer was sustained by the superior court, and the plaintiff electing not to plead further, judgment of dismissal was entered accordingly, from which he has appealed.

The argument of counsel upon both sides of the cause proceeds upon the assumption that the only question here…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Wood v. LakeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Scott v. LearyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1871
  3. Schroeppel v. CorningNew York Supreme Court · 1848
  4. Bexar Building & Loan Ass'n v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Baum v. ThomsIndiana Supreme Court · 1898

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Westman v. DyeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Edwards v. Surety Finance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Swanson v. MayCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  4. Schlattman v. StoneWyoming Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Flannery v. BishopWashington Supreme Court · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API