Legal Opinion

Edwards v. Surety Finance Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1934No. 24825. Department OnePublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

— Plaintiff instituted suit, under nine separate causes of action, to recover usury paid by him to defendant on nine promissory notes. The court found that the payments made by plaintiff on the first seven notes were usurious to the extent of $1,065.90 and on the last two notes to the extent of $160.15. The court held, however, that the first seven causes of action of the complaint were barred by the statute of limitations. As to the last two causes of action, upon which plaintiff was held entitled to recover, the court allowed an over-balancing offset, the origin and nature of which will be…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Butler v. Supreme CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Lee v. HillmanWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Bain v. WallaceWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  4. City of Seattle v. WalkerWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Richey & Gilbert Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Chandler v. Washington Toll Bridge AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Cannon v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Central Heat, Inc. v. Daily Olympian, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Halver v. WelleWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Johnson v. WhitmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API