Schlattman v. Stone
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
McINTYRE, Justice.
This is a usury case. Without disputing the facts parties on either side accept the facts to be as stated by the trial court in its findings. Accordingly, it can be assumed that:
Plaintiff, Harold C. Stone, conducted business with W.. H. Schlattman during Schlattman’s lifetime. The nature .of the business was that Stone would take invoices to Schlattman and assign them on the face of the invoice and Schlattman would then pay Stone either 94 percent or 95 percent of the face amount of the invoice. Stone would then direct the invoices to be paid to Schlattman. Stone was to pay…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Roberts v. RobertsWyoming Supreme Court · 1943
- Marshall v. BeelerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
- Blain v. WillsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
- Lee v. HillmanWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Flannery v. BishopWashington Supreme Court · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Billis v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
- Snell v. RuppertWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
- Greenwalt v. Ram Restaurant Corp. of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- Ball v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
- Bowers v. Wyoming State Treasurer Ex Rel. Workmen's Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.