Legal Opinion

Home Payment Jewelry Co. v. Smith

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 15, 1914No. Civ. No. 1443PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.

Appellant sued to recover possession of personal property consisting of certain articles of jewelry and for damages. A demurrer was interposed to the amended complaint, which was sustained by the trial court. Appellant declined to take advantage of the leave given to further amend, and from a judgment of dismissal this appeal was taken.

In the complaint it was set out that the appellant had delivered to one Mary C. Ames under a lease contract, which was set out in full as an exhibit attached to the amended complaint, certain articles of jewelry of the alleged value of one thousand and eighty,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Richards v. MoreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Bacon v. P. RobsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879
  3. McNally v. ConnollyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Taylor v. BernheimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  2. Law v. HeinigerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Shank v. BlackburnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  4. Phillips Aviation Co. v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Scottsdale Ginning Co. v. LonganArizona Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API