McNally v. Connolly
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from Superior Court, City and County of San Francisco.
1Opinion of the Court
SEARLS, C.
This is an action to recover possession of certain personal property, if possession can be had, and, if not, *622the value thereof. Defendant had judgment, from which, and from an order denying a new trial, plaintiffs appeal. In 1876, Owen Connolly, the defendant, took a lease of a lot of land on Fourth street, near Berry, in the city of San Francisco, for a term which was to expire January 1, 1881. There was a brick building upon the lot, but which did not cover the whole of it. Connolly paid his rent in full for the term, formed a copartnership with Charles D. Wheat, and, as such…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sargent v. SturmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
- Wellman v. EnglishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Bacon v. P. RobsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879
3Cited by1 opinion
- Home Payment Jewelry Co. v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914