Granneman v. Cincinnati Street Ry. Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BY THE COURT:
This appeal is attempted by the plaintiff from an order of the common pleas court which “overruled his motion for judgment on the verdict of the jury — and granted appellee’s motion for a new trial.”
The question is whether the court has any jurisdiction to review this order.
It is conceded that Hoffman v Knollman, 135 Oh St 170, decides that an order granting a motion for a new trial is not a final order and, therefore, riot appealable unless rfc. clearly appears that the trial court has abused its discretion in granting such order. And Steiner v Custer, 137 Oh St 446,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hoffman v. KnollmanOhio Supreme Court · 1939
- Steiner v. CusterOhio Supreme Court · 1940
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ojalvo v. Board of TrusteesOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Paramount Supply Co. v. Sherlin Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1984
- Clark v. Rockwood & Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1960
- Schaffter v. WardOhio Supreme Court · 1985