Legal Opinion
Paramount Supply Co. v. Sherlin Corp.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided June 18, 1984No. 47566 and 47592PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarkus, P.J.
Plaintiff-seller (Paramount Corporation) filed this action against defendant-buyer (Sherlin Corporation) for an alleged breach of a sales contract. Sherlin answered, denying that it breached the contract. Additionally, Sherlin and its sole shareholder (Harry Seton) counterclaimed that Paramount and its general manager breached the contract, tortiously interfered with it, and defamed them. After the parties concluded extensive discovery, the court granted summary judgment motions which denied any relief to anyone.
Paramount, Sherlin, and Seton appeal. Each complains that the trial court erred…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Peter L. Battista, Jr. v. Lebanon Trotting Association, and John J. Carlo, Peter L. Battista, Jr. v. Lebanon Trotting Association, and John J. CarloCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- Indermill v. United SavingsOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
- Reichman v. DrakeOhio Court of Appeals · 1951
- Brown v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
- West Los Angeles Institute for Cancer Research v. Ward MayerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Gosden v. LouisOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
- Fridovich v. FridovichSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- Software Clearing House, Inc. v. Intrak, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1990
- State ex rel. Drake v. Athens County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Fenelon v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.