Legal Opinion

Wilkenson v. Linnecke

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 23, 1967No. Civ. 29722PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKaus, P. J.

Defendant Linnecke appeals from a judgment in the sum of $10,000 compensatory damages plus $1,000 punitive damages. The judgment was based on findings that:

1. Linnecke promised the plaintiff Wood to perfect a security which Wood held to secure a loan he had made to one Madron.

2. The promise was made without intention to perform; and 3. without the security the loan had become worthless.

The basic facts are well known to the parties and need only be outlined: Madron and defendant were both interested in a corporation called Engle-Madron Company. Defendant was vice president and treasurer of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stevens v. MarcoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  2. Boyd v. BevilacquaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. Butler v. NeppleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Estate of SimmonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Koch v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kuffel v. Seaside Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Big Lots Stores, Inc. v. Bain Capital Fund VII, LLCCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2006
  3. City Bank of San Diego v. RamageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Rambo v. BlainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Kuffel v. Seaside Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API