Legal Opinion

Bialostok v. Wolfer

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1947PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFroessel, J.

The plaintiff, Max Bialostok, brought an action for the specific performance of an agreement for a joint venture, and for an accounting in connection therewith, against the defendants A. & M. Knitting Mills, Inc. and Arthur Wolfer.

- The agreement, dated July 12, 1943, was made between the plaintiff and the defendant Wolfer. The latter interposed an answer containing certain defenses and three counterclaims, and a cross claim against his codefendant. The court at Special Term for trials granted judgment in favor of the plaintiff with respect to the first cause of action for specific…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Schuylkill Fuel Corp. v. B. & C. Nieberg Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. McKeon v. . Van SlyckNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Dyer v. Broadway Central BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  4. Goldey v. BiermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  5. Sturtevant v. Fiss, Doerr & Carroll Horse Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Smith v. KirkpatrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
  2. Grattan v. Societa Per Azzioni Cotonficio CantoniNew York Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Towers v. DoroshawNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Eadie v. Arc Wood Development, Inc., New York County Courts1959
  5. Donohue v. MinicucciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API