Towers v. Doroshaw
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFrank Del Vecchio, J.
This is an action to recover compensation for services alleged to have been rendered by plaintiff prior and incidental to the merger of the corporate defendants.
The complaint alleges seven causes of action asking for various forms of relief all incidental to and arising out of conversations between the plaintiff Towers and the defendant Doroshaw.
As to the status of the parties at the times here in question: plaintiff Albert Towers was an industrial engineer and sales counsel, with his place of business at Seneca Falls, New York. Defendant Jennis Doroshaw was engaged in the investment business…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Sibbald v. . the Bethlehem Iron CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Insurance Co. v. DutcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Smith v. . BradyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Claim of Ahern v. South Buffalo Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
- McKeon v. . Van SlyckNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Seymore v. Reader's Digest Ass'n, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- Caliendo v. McFarlandNew York Supreme Court · 1958
- Becker v. Snowden Development Corp., New York County Courts1971
- Coleman v. Dover CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1974
- Paul F. Bevelheimer v. Slick Airways, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962