Fifield v. Fifield
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
Appellant Judith Fifield appeals the trial court’s modification of the parties’ dissolution decree. Appellant claims the trial court should have applied the child support guidelines when modifying child support and that the trial court abused its discretion by reducing respondent’s child support obligation. We affirm.
FACTS
The marriage of the parties was dissolved on December 13, 1983. The judgment reflected an agreement of the parties reached through lengthy and detailed negotiations. As part of the settlement, appellant Judith Fifield received cash and assets of over…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hadrava v. HadravaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Kiesow v. KiesowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Claybaugh v. ClaybaughSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Marriage of Arora v. AroraCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
3Cited by6 opinions
- Marriage of Moylan v. MoylanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Marriage of Katz v. KatzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Marriage of O'Connor v. O'ConnorCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Marriage of Scheiber v. AgeeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Marriage of Thuftin v. BushCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.