Marriage of Arora v. Arora
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
Vasu Arora appeals an order of the district court modifying a Wisconsin dissolution decree by reducing his future child support obligation from $600 to $400 per month. Arora contends that the trial court abused its discretion because it refused to retroactively modify the support obligation and did not set the support at a low enough level. We affirm.
FACTS
The marriage of Ranchan Arora, now Ranchan Daken, and Vasu Arora was dissolved by a Wisconsin court in 1977. Daken received custody of the couple’s two children, and child support was set at $600 per month. In making…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Reck v. ReckCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Matson v. MatsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. FuerstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Marriage of Rudolf v. RudolfSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fifield v. FifieldCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- In Re the Welfare of A.L.G.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Marriage of Miller v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Marriage of Looyen v. MartinsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986