Legal Opinion

Marriage of Arora v. Arora

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 17, 1984No. C3-84-163PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

Vasu Arora appeals an order of the district court modifying a Wisconsin dissolution decree by reducing his future child support obligation from $600 to $400 per month. Arora contends that the trial court abused its discretion because it refused to retroactively modify the support obligation and did not set the support at a low enough level. We affirm.

FACTS

The marriage of Ranchan Arora, now Ranchan Daken, and Vasu Arora was dissolved by a Wisconsin court in 1977. Daken received custody of the couple’s two children, and child support was set at $600 per month. In making…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Reck v. ReckCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Matson v. MatsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. State v. FuerstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  4. Marriage of Rudolf v. RudolfSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fifield v. FifieldCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  2. In Re the Welfare of A.L.G.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Marriage of Miller v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Marriage of Looyen v. MartinsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API