Legal Opinion

Marriage of O'Connor v. O'Connor

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 6, 1986No. C1-85-2214Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FORSBERG, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order denying a post-decree motion for establishment of child support and for an award of attorneys fees. Respondent seeks review of the denial of her motion for enforcement of the property settlement. We affirm.

FACTS

The marriage of appellant Philip O’Con-nor and respondent Karen O’Connor was dissolved by a judgment and decree entered October 1,1984. The parties had reached a stipulation covering all issues.

Appellant was granted custody of the two minor children (one child is still a minor). The homestead, located in Randolph, was to be…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. National Recruiters, Inc. v. Toro Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Mund v. MundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  3. Ramsay v. RamsaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. City of Brooklyn Center v. Metropolitan CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  5. Kass v. KassCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API