Legal Opinion

Wells v. Schuster-Hax National Bank

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1897PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Arapahoe County.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

The complaint in this action is in the nature of a creditor’s bill to set aside an alleged fraudulent conveyance, and subject the property so conveyed to the satisfaction of the judgment. In August, 1891, a judgment was obtained in the district court of Arapahoe county, Colorado, by the Schuster-Hax National Bank against Isaac T. Hosea for about $8,000, and the property in controversy here was then impressed with the lien thereof.

The present action to subject this property to the satisfaction of that judgment was brought in March, 1892, and the cause of action was based upon the prior…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Lloyd v. FultonSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Roan v. WinnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
  3. Gould v. HaydenIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Kermott v. AyerMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  5. Muncie National Bank v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921
  2. Junghans v. JunghansCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  3. Curran v. RothschildColorado Court of Appeals · 1900
  4. Moore v. Justices of the Municipal CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  5. Fern v. CrandellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API