Legal Opinion
Junghans v. Junghans
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided April 22, 1940No. 7370PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDGERTON, Associate Justice.
This is an appeal from an order which sequesters appellant’s property to satisfy a claim for alimony and counsel fees.
In 1926 appellee Margaret Junghans obtained in the District -Court a decree against appellant for a limited divorce, with alimony for the support of herself and child. In June, 1938, she sued appellant in Maryland to collect arrears of alimony, which she alleged to amount, with interest, to $6,226.68. On December 12, 1938, the jury in the Maryland action assessed her damages at $2,500, and judgment was entered against appellant on that verdict. His…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Sistare v. SistareSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. SchendelSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Loughran v. LoughranSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Roche v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Suydam v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Miller v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Martin v. TateDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- ætna Ins. Co. v. RhodesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
- George Billie Smith v. Sherman H. Crouse, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
- Morris v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.