Legal Opinion

Lloyd v. Fulton

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 17, 1876No. 108PublishedCited by 59 opinions

Arpe at, from tbe Circuit Court of tbe United States for the Northern District of Georgia. Fulton, the .appellee, having by his marriage acquired large means, which he had verbally agreed before and after his marriage should be held for the sole and separate use of his wife* executed the following indenture: — “ State oe Georgia, Columbia County.

Read the full summary

Arpe at, from tbe Circuit Court of tbe United States for the Northern District of Georgia. Fulton, the .appellee, having by his marriage acquired large means, which he had verbally agreed before and after his marriage should be held for the sole and separate use of his wife* executed the following indenture: — “ State oe Georgia, Columbia County. “ This itidenture, made this, the fourteenth day of September, 1864, between Montroville C. Fulton, of the county and state aforesaid, of the first part, and James S. Hamilton, of th.e same county and state, of the second part, witnesseth that said…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swayne

All the testimony in this case was taken by the appellee. He was complainant in the suit. Only two witnesses were examined, — himself, and his brother-in-law James S. Hamilton. There is no discrepancy in their statements. The facts lie within narrow limits.

Fulton, the appellee, married Virginia F. Hamilton, the daughter of Thomas N. Hamilton, in the year 1851. Her father was a man of very large fortune.' Fulton received by her, before and after her father’s' death, more than $100,000. He had himself, at the time of his marriage, substantially nothing. His father-in-law died intestate in 1859.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hinde's Lessee v. LongworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
  2. Olcott v. BynumSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. Seward v. Jackson ex dem. Van WyckCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1826
  4. Moritz v. HoffmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
  5. Salmon v. BennettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1816

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Peters v. BainSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Union Bank of Chicago v. Kansas City BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Jones v. CliftonSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Robinson & Co. v. BeltSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  5. First Nat. Bank v. GlassCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API