Kent v. Lyon
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SABERS, Justice.
[¶ 1] Kent appeals the South Dakota Division of Insurance’s revocation of his resident insurance agent’s license. The Division found Kent violated seven provisions of the Insurance Code. Kent disputes the violations and claims that the revocation of his license is too harsh a penalty. The circuit court agreed with the Division. We affirm.
FACTS
[¶2] Eugene Kent was a licensed insurance agent in South Dakota for twenty-two years prior to the revocation of his license in January of 1996. He owned and controlled Kent Insurance, Inc. (Kent Insurance), which has been licensed to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. RoweCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- Hendrix v. Graham Tire Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. MillsArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- Middlesex Insurance v. MannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- State v. HurstSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Paint Brush Corp. v. NeuSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Tunender v. MinnaertSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Enger v. FMCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Kroupa v. KroupaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- In re the Certifiability of JarmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.