Legal Opinion
Hendrix v. Graham Tire Co.
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided August 3, 1994No. 18463, 18475PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SABERS, Justice.
Employee appeals partially adverse determination of worker’s compensation benefits. We affirm.
*878FACTS
From July, 1981, until April 7, 1990, William Hendrix (Hendrix) was a route salesman for Graham Tire (Graham). His delivery route ranged from 300 to 1100 miles per week. Hendrix’s duties at Graham included the loading and unloading of tires ranging in size from car tires to farm tractor tires. Hendrix’s salary was based upon commissions and in his last full year of employment, his gross salary was $26,892.81.
On September 25, 1989, Hendrix, while in the course of his employment,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Caldwell v. John Morrell & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Valley Mould & Iron Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
- Day v. John Morrell & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Lawler v. Windmill RestaurantSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Hanson v. Penrod Construction Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Sopko v. C & R Transfer Co., Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Wagaman v. Sioux Falls ConstructionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Tischler v. United Parcel ServiceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- In Re the Sales & Use Tax Refund Request of Media One, Inc., License No. 51-0180701-STSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- First Nat. Bank of Biwabik, MN v. Bank of LemmonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.