Legal Opinion

In re the Certifiability of Jarman

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 2015No. 27115PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEVERSON, Justice.

[¶ 1.] After a contested hearing, the Law Enforcement Officers Standards and Training Commission (Commission) denied Brett Jarman’s application for law enforcement certification. Jarman appealed to the circuit court, which affirmed the Commission’s decision. He appeals, asserting *3that the Commission improperly based its decision on “expunged conduct.” We affirm.

Background

[¶ 2.] Brett Jarman applied to the Commission for law enforcement certification. He sought a certification of qualification as a candidate for county sheriff. All candidates for sheriff must meet the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. LaneTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. SchindlerTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Thurman v. Cuna Mutual Insurance SocietySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Engelhart v. KramerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Kent v. LyonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Andrews v. Ridco & Twin City Fire Ins. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Johnson v. UPSSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Carmody v. Lake County Bd. of Commn'rsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Ibrahim v. Dep't of Public SafetySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Jans v. Department of Public SafetySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API