Legal Opinion
Bowers v. Norton
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 17, 1928No. 26,568PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Olsen, C.
Plaintiffs appeal from an order denying their motion for a new trial.
The action is one to set aside as fraudulent as against creditors the deeds hereinafter mentioned. Defendants Delia P. Norton and George A. Norton were and are wife and husband. For many years and up to the time of the conveyances in question the wife was the owner of a farm of 185 acres in Dodge county, this state. The hus band and wife resided upon this farm in the dwelling house thereon from October, 1923, until October, 1925. It was their home and the 80 acres upon which the buildings were located was their…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Millett v. PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Stewart v. RhoadesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Gordon v. Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Eberhart v. National Citizens BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Robertson v. SullivanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hickman v. SutherlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Bowers v. NortonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Charles W. Ries, Trustee of the Bankruptcy Estate v. Linda C. ThiesseCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- In Re SikkinkUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1986