Legal Opinion

In Re Sikkink

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota

Decided April 25, 1986No. 19-40468PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JOHN J. CONNELLY, Bankruptcy Judge.

This matter came before the court upon the objection of the trustee and Farmers and Merchants Bank of Preston (“the bank”) to property claimed exempt by debtors. Sheridan Buckley, attorney, appeared on behalf of debtors. Timothy Moratzka, attorney, appeared by filing his objection. Jerrold Bergfalk, attorney, appeared on behalf of the bank.

Since approximately 1975, debtors have operated a farm on two parcels of land, both of which are being purchased under two separate contracts for deed. Parcel 1, consisting of 80 acres, is being purchased by debtors…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Denzer v. PrendergastSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  2. Millett v. PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  3. Clark v. DeweySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  4. Tillotson v. MillardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1862
  5. Bowers v. NortonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re CopeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1987
  2. In Re ColeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · 1995
  3. In Re EhrichUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API