Legal Opinion

Bowers v. Norton

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 23, 1928No. 26,918PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Olsen, O.

Appeal by plaintiffs from an order sustaining demurrers to the complaint on the ground that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The facts, as alleged in the complaint and presented by the record, are substantially as follows:

On June 7, 1923, the defendant Delia P. Norton ivas the owner of 157 acres of land in Dodge county, this state, 80 acres of which was then, and thereafter continued to be, her statutory homestead, until conveyed as hereinafter shown. On the date stated, she mortgaged the land for $6,000, her husband, George A. Norton,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Merchants' National Bank of Crookston v. StantonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  2. Clark v. KrakerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  3. Daniels v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1860
  4. Howard v. BurnsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  5. Bowers v. NortonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ramette v. United States (In Re Bame)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2001
  2. JaKS Farm Custom Forage Harvesting, L.L.C. v. Anderson (In Re Anderson)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
  3. JaKS Farm Custom v. Donald A. AndersonUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API