Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Rhoades

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 5, 1888PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal by defendants D. G. Rhoades and wife from so much of a judgment of the district court for Wadena county, Sleeper, J., presiding, as adjudged a lien upon and directed a sale of a certain lot in the village of Verndale.

1Opinion of the CourtCollies, J.

The plaintiff attempts in this action to recover judgment against the first-named defendant for the value of certain building material sold by him, and used in the construction of a dwelling upon a village lot, and to have the amount thereof declared a lien upon the lot, as provided in chapter 90, Gen. St. 1878. The principal defence is that the premises on which the lien is claimed are exempt under the homestead laws of this state, and' therefore not subject to the lien demanded. To that part of the answer asserting the homestead right, the plaintiff, in his reply, admitted such homestead…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Donaldson v. LampreySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  2. Williams v. MoodySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  3. Robertson v. SullivanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Quehl v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  2. Hickman v. SutherlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  3. Gordon v. Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  4. Joy v. Cooperative Oil Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Sheehan v. First Nat. Bank of WasecaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API