Legal Opinion

Travelers Casualty Insurance Co. of America v. Hirsh

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 3, 2016No. 14-55539PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Concurrence by Judge KOZINSKI;

Concurrence by Judge GOULD

OPINION

2Per curiam

In this diversity suit, Robert W. Hirsh appeals the denial of his special motion under the California anti-strategic lawsuit against public participation (“anti-SLAPP”) statute, Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 425.16, to strike the second amended complaint filed by Travelers Casualty Insurance Company of America (“Travelers”). We affirm.

1. Notwithstanding that the denial of the anti-SLAPP motion did not give rise to what traditionally would be deemed a final judgment (one resolving all claims in a suit), our precedents establish our *1181jurisdi…

3Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Rusheen v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Linder v. Thrifty Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Batzel v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. San Diego Navy Federal Credit Union v. Cumis Insurance SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. Peregrine Funding, Inc. v. Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by10 opinions

  1. Planned Parenthood Federation v. Center for Medical ProgressCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. In re Gawker Media LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2017
  3. Gottesman v. SantanaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2017
  4. Kim Martinez v. Zoominfo Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  5. Catlin Insurance Company, Inc. v. DankoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API