Catlin Insurance Company, Inc. v. Danko
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CATLIN INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., Case No. 20-cv-01345-HSG 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE AND GRANTING IN PART 9 v. AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS 10 DANKO MEREDITH, Re: Dkt. No. 21 11 Defendant. 12 13 Pending before the Court is Defendant Danko Meredith’s motion to strike and motion to 14 dismiss. Dkt. No. 21. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral 15 argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons detailed 16 below, the Court DENIES…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Baral v. SchnittCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- Kwan v. SanMedica InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.