Legal Opinion
Gottesman v. Santana
District Court, S.D. California
Decided July 6, 2017No. Case No.: 16-CV-2902 JLS (JLB)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON (1) ATTORNEY DEFENDANTS’ SPECIAL ANTI-SLAPP MOTION TO STRIKE AND (2) PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE
(ECF Nos. 77, 158)
Hon. Janis L. Sammartino, United States District Judge
Presently before the Court are Defendants Daniel J. Schacht, Esq.’s, (“Shacht”) and the law firm Donahue Fitzgerald LLP’s, (“Donahue”) (collectively, the “At*1037torney Defendants”) Special Motion to Strike Plaintiffs FAC Under California’s Anti-SLAPP Law,1 (“anti-SLAPP MTS,” ECF No. 77), and Attorney Defendants’ Reply in Support of Special Motion to Strike (Anti-SLAPP) and Rule 12(f) Motion to Strike, (“anti-SLAPP MTS…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Cyrus Ghazali v. John Moran, Sheriff Clark County CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Whittlestone, Inc. v. Handi-Craft Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Adamson v. Pierce CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
- Doe v. Google LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
- Garrison v. RinggoldDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2019
- Lough v. Washington State Department of Social and Health ServicesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2021
- Moschetti v. Office of the Inspector GeneralDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.